by SHANNON TONKIN -Illawarra Mercury
Rejected plans for a factory outlet and homemaker centre at Kembla Grange could be given a second chance tonight.
Wollongong
councillors will debate the $110million proposal for the second time
in two weeks after Liberal councillor Bede Crasnich lodged a rescission
motion against a council decision to reject the plans at its February 27
meeting.
Supported by Cr Michelle Blicavs (Lib) and Cr Chris
Connor (ALP), Cr Crasnich will present a petition with more than 400
signatures to tonight’s meeting in the hope it will convince his fellow
councillors to move the proposal to the next stage of the process - a
NSW planning department review.
The three councillors have
identified seven reasons for supporting the rescission motion, claiming
that a range of benefits from the proposal were not addressed in the
original debate on the issue.
‘‘The opportunity for community
consultation and comment was removed by the council’s decision on
February 27,’’ Cr Crasnich said.
‘‘This petition is a small sample size of how people feel about this proposal, and it’s obvious that it’s wanted.’’
Lord
Mayor Gordon Bradbery used his casting vote to throw out the zoning
proposal that called for factory outlet and bulky goods uses to be
included in the site’s light industrial zoning.
His move has been
supported by the Shopping Centre Council of Australia (SCCA), which
counts GPT, Westfield and Stockland among its members.
SCCA deputy
director Angus Nardi claimed that allowing the proposal to proceed
would ‘‘make a mockery’’ of the planning system and ignore the council’s
own planning studies and strategies.
‘‘The clear and
long-recognised urban planning deficiencies of the Kembla Grange
proposal should not now be overlooked by [the] council,’’ he said.
Mr
Nardi rejected claims his comments could be interpreted as
‘‘anti-competitive’’, saying the SCCA welcomed retail investment and
economic activity in the region, as long as it was in accordance with
established planning rules, ‘‘as our members’ investments are’’.
No comments:
Post a Comment